From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 21 07:26:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAE3C16A4CE; Fri, 21 May 2004 07:26:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from comp.chem.msu.su (comp.chem.msu.su [158.250.32.97]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EC0543D49; Fri, 21 May 2004 07:26:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yar@comp.chem.msu.su) Received: from comp.chem.msu.su (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by comp.chem.msu.su (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i4LEQT3F062041; Fri, 21 May 2004 18:26:29 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from yar@comp.chem.msu.su) Received: (from yar@localhost) by comp.chem.msu.su (8.12.9p2/8.12.9/Submit) id i4LEQSns062040; Fri, 21 May 2004 18:26:29 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from yar) Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 18:26:28 +0400 From: Yar Tikhiy To: "George V.Neville-Neil" Message-ID: <20040521142628.GA61458@comp.chem.msu.su> References: <20040521135759.GE57132@comp.chem.msu.su> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: hackers@freebsd.org cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bugfix for checksum offload in bge(4) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 14:26:45 -0000 On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 11:11:41PM +0900, George V.Neville-Neil wrote: > > > > While sweeping network interface drivers for incorrect usage of the > > capabilities framework, I noticed some bugs in bge(4). Unfortunately, > > I have no such card and I don't know its internals. Therefore I > > made a patch fixing hw-independent bugs and marking some questionable > > spots. It would be nice if somebody possessing the knowledge on > > bge(4) reviewed this patch and used it to really fix the things. If > > nobody undertakes that, I'll just commit my change since it doesn't > > seem to affect the functionality while it brings the code into the shape. > > Thanks! > > I have such a card and can look into this. It may take a bit though, > perhaps a week or so. Thank you George, that would be great. A week is not a problem after it took me two months to spare time to make the patch :-) -- Yar