From owner-freebsd-announce Fri May 26 09:10:53 1995 Return-Path: announce-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id JAA29164 for announce-outgoing; Fri, 26 May 1995 09:10:53 -0700 Received: from ref.tfs.com (ref.tfs.com [140.145.254.251]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id JAA28997 ; Fri, 26 May 1995 09:07:15 -0700 Received: (from phk@localhost) by ref.tfs.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) id JAA01495; Fri, 26 May 1995 09:06:06 -0700 From: Poul-Henning Kamp Message-Id: <199505261606.JAA01495@ref.tfs.com> Subject: Re: Drivers for FORE systems cards under FreeBSD To: imb@scgt.oz.au Date: Fri, 26 May 1995 09:06:05 -0700 (PDT) Cc: hasty@netcom.com, julian@ref.tfs.com, pss@fore.com, announce@FreeBSD.org, hackers@FreeBSD.org, rv@fore.com In-Reply-To: <199505261152.VAA07277@asstdc.scgt.oz.au> from "michael butler" at May 26, 95 09:52:32 pm Content-Type: text Content-Length: 814 Sender: announce-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > No promises over here but I am going to try to remedy the ATM situation. > > Nor I am going to state who am I going to be dealing with . > > Much as I hate generalisations .. I would warn that ATM and IP apparently do > not mix well in cases where good interactive response is critical, at least > in my limited experience. I get better response over my own overworked 14k4 > modem connection to the net than over a (university based) 2 megabit ATM > link. This is not a general problem with ATM, and I tend to say that it's because there are other users on the 2Mb ATM than you. It's certainly not an argument against ATM... -- Poul-Henning Kamp -- TRW Financial Systems, Inc. 'All relevant people are pertinent' && 'All rude people are impertinent' => 'no rude people are relevant'