Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 20:53:18 +0200 From: alex@manta.mayn.de (Alexander Langer) To: Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com>, Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/balsa Makefile ports/mail/balsa/files md5 ports/mail/balsa/patches patch-aq patch-aj patch-ak patch-al patch-ar ports/mail/balsa/pkg PLIST Message-ID: <20000829205318.A40381@manta.mayn.de> In-Reply-To: <20000829075648.T73638@radon.gryphonsoft.com>; from andrews@technologist.com on Tue, Aug 29, 2000 at 07:56:48AM -0500 References: <200008291007.DAA34217@freefall.freebsd.org> <20000829075648.T73638@radon.gryphonsoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thus spake Will Andrews (andrews@technologist.com): > two big reasons: 1) Fewer inodes used ; 2) More maintainable. It > should be in the Porter's Handbook, IMHO. I agree, for patches that would result in many little files otherwise. Add it to the handbook :) Alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000829205318.A40381>