From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 16:28:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0B8A16A4CE; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 16:28:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from postman.arcor.de (newsread1.arcor-online.net [151.189.0.146]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DF1C43D48; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 16:28:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com) Received: from fillmore.dyndns.org (port-212-202-51-138.reverse.qsc.de [212.202.51.138]) (authenticated bits=0)i2N0SWck007029 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 23 Mar 2004 01:28:32 +0100 (MET) Received: from [172.16.0.2] (helo=fillmore-labs.com) by fillmore.dyndns.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1B5ZmP-0006Mj-RF; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 01:28:29 +0100 Message-ID: <405F84AD.1070708@fillmore-labs.com> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 01:28:29 +0100 From: Oliver Eikemeier Organization: Fillmore Labs GmbH - http://www.fillmore-labs.com/ MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adam Weinberger References: <200403222030.i2MKUsxc063289@8ball.rtp.freebsd.org> <20040322211501.GB87493@toxic.magnesium.net> In-Reply-To: <20040322211501.GB87493@toxic.magnesium.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: KMail/1.5.9 cc: ports@FreeBSD.org cc: Kris Kennaway cc: openoffice@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: INDEX build failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 00:28:35 -0000 Adam Weinberger wrote: >>>(03.22.2004 @ 1530 PST): Kris Kennaway said, in 1.6K: << >> >>INDEX build failed with errors: >>Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: openoffice-1.1.1.RC1 >>Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: es-openoffice-1.1.1.RC1 >> >>>end of "INDEX build failed" from Kris Kennaway << > > I recognize that it's an unbelievable amount of work to make openoffice > build right, but can development please be done elsewhere? The port > doesn't even build right now (it rejects any jdk I have installed in > configure). If 1.1.1.RC1 isn't working, can you please put 1.1 back in > the tree? > > You're not using openoffice-2.0 for anything. Why not use that for the > 1.1.1.RC1 development for the time being? See the discussion in Oliver