From owner-cvs-user  Fri Sep  5 09:04:55 1997
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-user>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id JAA16414
          for cvs-user-outgoing; Fri, 5 Sep 1997 09:04:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rocky.mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA16250;
          Fri, 5 Sep 1997 09:00:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.mt.sri.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id KAA08880; Fri, 5 Sep 1997 10:00:45 -0600 (MDT)
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 1997 10:00:45 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <199709051600.KAA08880@rocky.mt.sri.com>
From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Peter Wemm <peter@freebsd.org>
Cc: cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, cvs-user@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src Makefile
In-Reply-To: <199709050911.CAA03573@freefall.freebsd.org>
References: <199709050911.CAA03573@freefall.freebsd.org>
X-Mailer: VM 6.29 under 19.15 XEmacs Lucid
Sender: owner-cvs-user@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> peter       1997/09/05 02:11:25 PDT
> 
>   Modified files:
>     .                    Makefile 
>   Log:
>   Back out use of -m, since 2.1.x apparently do not have it. (sigh..)

Can't we assume that people will be upgrading from a 2.2 system for
-current, so that you can leave it in, but take it out for 2.2?



Nate