Date: Sun, 29 May 2016 16:33:38 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: apache@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 209743] www/apache24: Cannot load /usr/local/libexec/apache24/mod_ssl.so, after upgrade from 2.4.18 Message-ID: <bug-209743-16115-wsLdSN6qdp@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-209743-16115@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-209743-16115@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D209743 --- Comment #29 from Ron Wingfield <Ron.Wingfield@archaxis.net> --- Created attachment 170802 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D170802&action= =3Dedit Details of solution. Good morning Gentlemen: I have analyzed, identified and solved the immediate problem, and I have attached a PDF copy of my solution. I have discovered that the FreeBSD base (/usr/lib) instance of libssl.so.7 does NOT contain ANY symbols; however, libssl.a DOES. This before and after upgrading the OS from v10.1 to v10.3.= =20 The solution as noted in the attached PDF was to delete and reinstall Apach= e24, i.e., # make build install Apache24 . . .with following caveat in /etc/make.conf: WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=3DYES. This directs Apache2.4.20_1 to incorporate the Ports version of OPENSSL. Can this be a "bug" in the base version of OPENSSL? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-209743-16115-wsLdSN6qdp>