From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Mar 14 02:22:22 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id CAA13796
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 14 Mar 1996 02:22:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id CAA13784
          for <hackers@freefall.freebsd.org>; Thu, 14 Mar 1996 02:22:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.4/8.6.9) with SMTP id XAA08044; Wed, 13 Mar 1996 23:06:56 -0800 (PST)
To: "Kaleb S. KEITHLEY" <kaleb@x.org>
cc: hackers@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: new malloc/libc... 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 13 Mar 1996 09:11:37 EDT."
             <199603131411.OAA21221@exalt.x.org> 
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 23:06:56 -0800
Message-ID: <8041.826787216@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> I think it would be an extremely bad idea to re-release 2.1 for any
> reason. If you want to put the new malloc in an officially released 

Huh?!  Where did you get the idea that we were doing that?

We never re-release releases, period.  We do point releases after the
fact, and 2.1.1 was actually already in the planning stages before
2.1-RELEASE ever came out.

					Jordan