Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 00:35:27 -0500 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> To: Murray Stokely <murray@freebsdmall.com> Cc: gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fam Message-ID: <1111210527.41721.40.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> In-Reply-To: <20050319030449.GG4271@freebsdmall.com> References: <20050319030449.GG4271@freebsdmall.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-gdBBEk0q1Cdb/rLQIWPX Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 19:04 -0800, Murray Stokely wrote: > How important is fam to GNOME. Should we add a commented out entry to > inetd.conf? Any comment on PR: conf/74004? I'll say it's critical to a user-friendly GNOME installation. Without FAM, you will need to restart gnome-panel each time you install new software, the GTK+ file chooser doesn't update dynamically nor does Nautilus (or anything related to the file system). I can't imagine actually using a GNOME installation without FAM. I think a commented out entry in /etc/inetd.conf would be good. I think teaching the devel/fam port to create an active entry in inetd.conf to be better. Joe >=20 > - Murray > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-gnome-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-gdBBEk0q1Cdb/rLQIWPX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCO7ofb2iPiv4Uz4cRAuacAJ9wilN7xq2V6uOkKN+te6A0CjvaxwCeJdnJ yymK+gJpiECG+tT3uXY3+rk= =RLxH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-gdBBEk0q1Cdb/rLQIWPX--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1111210527.41721.40.camel>