From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 22 04:05:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D81716A41F for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 04:05:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sbruno@miralink.com) Received: from mazo.miralink.com (67.105.142.88.ptr.us.xo.net [67.105.142.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BED343D4C for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 04:05:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sbruno@miralink.com) Received: from home-desk (pool-71-111-116-105.ptldor.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.111.116.105]) by mazo.miralink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F7A636AB4; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 20:05:03 -0800 (PST) From: Sean Bruno To: Daniel O'Connor In-Reply-To: <200511221424.54872.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> References: <1132629660.4202.3.camel@home-desk> <200511221424.54872.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 20:04:46 -0800 Message-Id: <1132632286.4202.7.camel@home-desk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VIA 8237 under FreeBSD 4.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 04:05:05 -0000 On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 14:24 +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 13:51, Sean Bruno wrote: > > I'm looking for some information on the VIA 8237 SATA controller under > > 4.11. It does indeed work as advertised, but the Abit VA-20 Mobo I am > > using seems to be causing the two SATA disks to be detected at a speed > > of UDMA 66, not 150. > > > > Do I have to modify the settings on the driver when I compile it to get > > better speed reports, or is this nothing to worry about? > > 4.x doesn't really support SATA as such. > It will use them in some sort of backwards compatible way. > > In general it will probably work OK until you get an SATA PHY error and then > the whole PC will lock up because the OS isn't polling the error register.. > Bummer...Is this a general issue of the way 4.X handles SATA? I.e. Would the ICH5 work any better to your knowledge? Sean