From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 27 20:22:46 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A94416A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 20:22:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp11.wanadoo.fr (smtp11.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF97643D1F for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 20:22:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf1103.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 7A1681C000AD for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 21:22:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from pix.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-111-2-1-3.w81-50.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.50.80.3]) by mwinf1103.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 59ABE1C000A4 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 21:22:44 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20050227202244367.59ABE1C000A4@mwinf1103.wanadoo.fr Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 21:22:44 +0100 From: Anthony Atkielski X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1923145231.20050227212244@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050227182135.GB44277@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: <1244061749.20050227165831@wanadoo.fr> <20050227164906.GA44277@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <958577347.20050227184416@wanadoo.fr> <20050227182135.GB44277@slackbox.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Odd message from cron daemon X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 20:22:46 -0000 Roland Smith writes: > Could it be that the cron output is mailed to someone else on the > production machine? I checked my aliases and stuff and sent some test messages to operator, and they get through okay. Apparently it's not happening on my production box, only on the test box. > It works OK on my 5.3 box, though. My system has revision 1.2 of > /usr/libexec/save-entropy, and it is 3073 bytes. Yours should be the > same, since the revision dates to Januari 2001. Yes, that's what I have as well, on both machines. > Is there any difference between /usr/libexec/save-entropy and > /usr/src/libexec/save-entropy/save-entropy.sh ? They should be > identical. They are the same on my machines. > Hmmm, disk or filesystem trouble maybe? I guess that would show in the > logfile. Maybe an fsck on /usr in single user mode helps? I have tons of SCSI errors on the test machine, for reasons unknown. I don't know if data is actually being lost or not. But even if that were the case, wouldn't I see the corruption in the save-entropy file? -- Anthony