Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 12:54:31 +0100 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Thierry Thomas <thierry@pompo.net> Subject: Re: Validating docbook articles... Message-ID: <xzpd686huyw.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <4039D0FE.3010905@FreeBSD.org> (Alex Dupre's message of "Mon, 23 Feb 2004 11:07:58 %2B0100") References: <8D03FA54-4BA6-11D8-8D97-003065ABFD92@pkix.net> <20040216130659.GC617@submonkey.net> <4031364A.2070708@pkix.net> <20040222181114.GB32524@graf.pompo.net> <40390248.1060104@pkix.net> <4039D0FE.3010905@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org> writes: > The -preserve flag was added by phantom in tidy, it's not in the > original tidy archive. And tidy-devel has no additional flag that can > be set to simulate the -preserve flag. We need to add it to > tidy-devel, too. This reminds me of the many good reasons to convert the doc tree to XML. One of these is that xmllint can both validate input files and clean up output files, and it does a far better job of it than tidy. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpd686huyw.fsf>