From owner-freebsd-binup Tue Oct 16 11: 5: 0 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-binup@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 885) id 224D337B410; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 11:04:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 11:04:59 -0700 From: Eric Melville To: Josef Karthauser Cc: Murray Stokely , binup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: design issues Message-ID: <20011016110459.F4211@FreeBSD.org> References: <20011014170515.B39749@FreeBSD.org> <20011014180507.D2654@windriver.com> <20011015020834.Y31066@tao.org.uk> <20011014181709.E2654@windriver.com> <20011015023057.A31066@tao.org.uk> <20011016110056.E4211@FreeBSD.org> <20011016190223.I83396@tao.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20011016190223.I83396@tao.org.uk>; from joe@tao.org.uk on Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 07:02:23PM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-binup@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > None. The point is 'tools not policy'. It should be possible to > separate the backend database description from the implementation of the > package system so that anything is possible. At the moment it's not > possible to do anything other than use /var/db/pkg/. I'm not saying > that it should be default. I'm saying that it should be possible. I see, I misread the previous comment. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-binup" in the body of the message