From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 20 01:15:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A399D16A403; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 01:15:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dandee@hellteam.net) Received: from pipa.vshosting.cz (pipa.vshosting.cz [81.0.201.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF6C743D4C; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 01:15:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dandee@hellteam.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pipa.vshosting.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D82E4E70E; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 03:15:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pipa.vshosting.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pipa [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11867-08; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 03:15:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gandalf (unknown [81.0.245.205]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pipa.vshosting.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AB5F4E705; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 03:15:17 +0200 (CEST) From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Daniel_Dvo=F8=E1k?= To: "'Sam Leffler'" Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 03:15:11 +0200 Message-ID: <001201c6dc52$3a9414d0$6508280a@tocnet28.jspoj.czf> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 Thread-Index: AcbcTFd7QDFgrZ4ZRoiGZfSX7BMaOgAA2pmQ In-Reply-To: <45108C37.1090109@errno.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at profix.cz Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, 'Henrik Brix Andersen' Subject: RE: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/ath if_ath.c if_athvar.h 1.153 X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: dandee@volny.cz List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 01:15:20 -0000 Okay about vendors, a) and b) compex and its WPE54AG supports "smartselect" funcion aka DFS and = country select as we talked about it recently. http://www.i4shop.net/cz/iObchod/Catalog.asp?ca=3D1620&it=3D9259 http://www.inwifi.cz/stahnete-si/soubor.php?f=3D4f1d47475a466cb321f82dea2= 00f92 d1 I tested these 2 boxes, they worked in smartselection mode, yes true, I = am not very sure about that because I did not scan it by kismet, so perhaps they worked seeming. About complaining, I did not want to complain you at all !!! Read my e-mail clearly I said = I disagree with you only one thing, it is how you wrote "slipped = requirement". And directly about Atheros, they do not answer repeatedly on my question about win32 drivers oid=B4s = so now I do not count that even they answer if I complain them now. You = know. :) Daniel > -----Original Message----- > From: Sam Leffler [mailto:sam@errno.com]=20 > Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 2:33 AM > To: dandee@volny.cz > Cc: 'Henrik Brix Andersen'; cvs-src@FreeBSD.org;=20 > src-committers@FreeBSD.org; cvs-all@FreeBSD.org > Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/ath if_ath.c if_athvar.h 1.153 >=20 > Daniel Dvor(=E1k wrote: > > Hi all, > >=20 > > I disagree with that the requirement had been slipped.=20 > Where is it written ? > >=20 > > In our country this requirement still exists and the same=20 > is with ETSI=20 > > the whole Europe countries. It was required one year ago=20 > and the same is now. > >=20 > > Our regulator have not said something similar to "Okay,=20 > this DFS was=20 > > mistake and after 1 year, now, we do not require it. We wanted that=20 > > simple because of funny." > >=20 > > I am surprised, how hardware vendors with whole source of hal still=20 > > can respect licence to transmit in 5G band legally with=20 > working DFS,=20 > > but open source systems did not offer this requirement after many=20 > > months and even DFS is abolished. > >=20 > > I am sorry if I was rude, but I get upset that there was=20 > not legally=20 > > atheros drivers for OSS and is not and it seems it will not. > >=20 > > I still beliefed DFS will be in ath drivers, but not. Do=20 > you remember=20 > > my questions and interest about DFS and TPC and your answers ? > >=20 > > I understand I am not a developer so I am not entitled to=20 > be irritated=20 > > with this, but I have a law to tell you what I think about=20 > whole it.=20 > > (IMHO) > >=20 > > It is a big pity! > >=20 > > Sam, you know that I admire and respect your hard work for=20 > our beloved=20 > > fbsd, I am sorry if my unexpected words make you angry with=20 > me, but I=20 > > deeply, very deeply disagree with you about slipped requirement. > >=20 > > There still exists. > >=20 > > Thanks for your attention. >=20 > TPC has been supported for a long time. DFS can be=20 > implemented w/o the hal blindly interfering. Talk to the=20 > madwifi folks about why having the hal try to do radar=20 > processing is bad; they suffered through the one hal release=20 > Atheros made (note Atheros, not me) where there was an=20 > attempt at detecting radar for the purpose of implementing DFS. >=20 > If you read my original commit msg it clearly states I am=20 > removing stub code. If you want to complain that Atheros=20 > isn't giving away a radar/DFS implementation then talk to=20 > them. But be sure to show up with a list of vendors that: a)=20 > currently do so, or b) provide sufficient information about=20 > their hardware that you can implement it yourself. I figure=20 > if you can supply either they will immediately provide=20 > code--if it's even possible. >=20 > Sam >=20