From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Sep 15 11:07:53 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 693581065670;
	Wed, 15 Sep 2010 11:07:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@freebsd.org)
Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4267C8FC08;
	Wed, 15 Sep 2010 11:07:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from porto.topspin.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua
	[212.40.38.100])
	by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id OAA05671;
	Wed, 15 Sep 2010 14:07:47 +0300 (EEST)
	(envelope-from avg@freebsd.org)
Received: from localhost.topspin.kiev.ua ([127.0.0.1])
	by porto.topspin.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD))
	id 1Ovpq6-0000N2-Oy; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 14:07:46 +0300
Message-ID: <4C90A901.5000200@freebsd.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 14:07:45 +0300
From: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US;
	rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100912 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk>
References: <20100908084855.GF2465@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
	<4C874F00.3050605@freebsd.org>
	<A6D7E134B24F42E395C30A375A6B50AF@multiplay.co.uk>
	<4C8D087B.5040404@freebsd.org>
	<03537796FAB54E02959E2D64FC83004F@multiplay.co.uk>
	<4C8D280F.3040803@freebsd.org>
	<3FBF66BF11AA4CBBA6124CA435A4A31B@multiplay.co.uk>
	<4C8E4212.30000@freebsd.org>
	<B98EBECBD399417CA5390C20627384B1@multiplay.co.uk>
	<D79F15FEB5794315BD8668E40B414BF0@multiplay.co.uk>
	<20100915104635.GA59871@icarus.home.lan>
	<8E233260F0334BC58B2C07F383939F8E@multiplay.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <8E233260F0334BC58B2C07F383939F8E@multiplay.co.uk>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, jhell <jhell@DataIX.net>,
	Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: zfs very poor performance compared to ufs due to lack of cache?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 11:07:53 -0000

on 15/09/2010 13:54 Steven Hartland said the following:
> 
> Already running that as part of the patches unfortunately, it doesn't seem
> to have any effect.

Well, it does have an effect for me in strictly controlled micro-test.

-- 
Andriy Gapon