From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 14 12:50:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC10316A4AB for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2006 12:50:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from om-lists-bsd@omx.ch) Received: from andromeda.insign.ch (andromeda.insign.ch [195.134.143.165]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F40C543D46 for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2006 12:47:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from om-lists-bsd@omx.ch) Received: (qmail 18972 invoked by uid 508); 14 Nov 2006 12:46:57 -0000 Received: from om-lists-bsd@omx.ch by andromeda3 by uid 502 with qmail-scanner-1.21 (avp(2004-05-12). Clear:RC:1(80.254.166.203):. Processed in 0.01789 secs); 14 Nov 2006 12:46:57 -0000 Received: from zux166-203.adsl.green.ch (HELO oli2.insign) ([80.254.166.203]) (envelope-sender ) by 0 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 14 Nov 2006 12:46:57 -0000 From: Olivier Mueller To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <200611141159.kAEBxKql028263@lurza.secnetix.de> References: <200611141159.kAEBxKql028263@lurza.secnetix.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 13:46:58 +0100 Message-Id: <1163508418.24336.8.camel@oli2.insign.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: 6.1 with PAE on a recent server (HP DL380 G5 or Dell PE 1950) ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 12:50:10 -0000 Bonjour, On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 12:59 +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote: > > But of course if you (and Mike Jakubik) strongly suggest it would be a > > good idea, why not, I will give a try asap :-) Any special thing I > > should take care of when switching from the i686 kernel to the amd64 > > one? > > The easiest way is to re-install with an /amd64 ISO. On new servers, sure. But on already active (and in production) systems? I guess a make buildkernel is not enought, and that at least a make buildworld would be necessary? Or even some ports? I can go offline for a few minutes, but certainly not hours... :) > > Will the systems be quicker this way, > > When addressing more than 4 GB of physical RAM, a native > 64bit system is certainly more efficient (hence quicker) > than the PAE kludge. Ok, good point. Thanks for your feedback! regards, Olivier