Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 23 Jan 2016 10:28:16 +0200
From:      Stanislav Galabov <sgalabov@gmail.com>
To:        Michal Meloun <mmel@freebsd.org>
Cc:        "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-mips@freebsd.org" <freebsd-mips@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: SPI geom_flashmap/fdt_slicer support, FDT 'resets=' support and a move of ohci_fdt.c
Message-ID:  <57E542F6-FCF2-4E51-9FE5-8EDD85DA2102@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <56A1BFBB.8050204@freebsd.org>
References:  <B4B24B7D-B3EE-4F37-9E89-24FF17294C70@gmail.com> <CANCZdfrt-EdzFuXFSP2sTAX2vxP_RKAamKgUeL0u7hZYxeOF_A@mail.gmail.com> <2AB9D6E1-BFF8-4EEE-B366-C980B72C4779@gmail.com> <CAJ-Vmo=DcfSXsuLUpcMvogjWNmNrniNsPxshhmHcGoWOxWM=CQ@mail.gmail.com> <CANCZdfr4frLMAfRiaHoVFPhi8hDa8rXSr5xjTyMQpUqoS-RT7g@mail.gmail.com> <56A1BFBB.8050204@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


> On Jan 22, 2016, at 07:35, Michal Meloun <mmel@freebsd.org> wrote:
>=20
> Dne 22.01.2016 v 5:43 Warner Losh napsal(a):
>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 8:35 PM, Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>=20
>>>> On 18 January 2016 at 06:49, Stanislav Galabov <sgalabov@gmail.com> wro=
te:
>>>> Hi Warner,
>>>>=20
>>>> I was thinking resets could help in general, not specifically in the
>>> case of trying to implement a generic ohci_fdt driver.
>>>>=20
>>>> As I already mentioned to you off-list (and in order for this message t=
o
>>> possibly make some more sense), I saw that Linux makes use of the =E2=80=
=98resets=E2=80=99
>>> property and looked at the documentation for it:
>>> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/Documentation/devicetree/b=
indings/reset/reset.txt
>>> <
>>> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/Documentation/devicetree/b=
indings/reset/reset.txt
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>> For example, with the work I am currently doing on Ralink/Mediatek
>>> support, I have over 10 different chips in the same family, that have ve=
ry
>>> similar peripheral blocks, but their clocks and resets are controlled vi=
a
>>> different bits in one of the SysCtl registers (the register itself is at=

>>> the same offset within the SysCtl block of each chip). So I may have chi=
p X
>>> which has its USB (for example) reset controlled by bit 10 and chip Y wi=
th
>>> USB reset controlled by bit 12.
>>>>=20
>>>> So being able to write something like:
>>>>        resets =3D <&sysctl 10>;
>>>> or
>>>>        resets =3D <&sysctl 11>;
>>>>=20
>>>> in my dts/dtsi files helps me immensely, instead of having to check wha=
t
>>> chip I am running on and based on that use a different register layout=E2=
=80=A6
>>>> Then, if I wanted to (de)assert reset for a peripheral block that has
>>> this property defined I=E2=80=99d just do fdt_reset_(de)assert_all(dev),=
 where dev
>>> is the device_t for the peripheral in question. This would (de)assert al=
l
>>> reset pins associated with the peripheral.
>>>>=20
>>>> The same is the case for clock control (gating) in the Ralink/Mediatek
>>> SoCs and this is the main reason I used fdt_clock that is already in
>>> sys/dev/fdt and then thought about implementing the fdt_reset based on i=
t.
>>>>=20
>>>> I hope this clarifies a bit my reason for submitting the fdt_reset patc=
h.
>>>=20
>>> This seems fine to me. Hm. Ian? Any comments?
>>=20
>> I want to check on a few things before we head down this path. I've been
>> traveling so haven't had a chance to look through it to see if Atmel uses=

>> this, and who else does...
>>=20
>> Warner
> I think that i have more complete implementation of reset framework
> ready to commit. Just waiting for mentor approval.
> Please see https://github.com/strejda/tegra/tree/master/sys/dev/reset
>=20
> Michal

I have no objections to using Michal's framework, especially if the patch fr=
om PR 206516 is applied:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D206516

His framework is really more complete than what I did.

Best wishes,
Stanislav

>>> -a
>>>=20
>>>> Best wishes
>>>> Stanislav
>>>>=20
>>>>> On Jan 18, 2016, at 02:04, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote:
>>>>>=20
>>>>> I don't see how resets help. Maybe I missed where it was documented,
>>> could you send that to me?
>>>>>=20
>>>>> Even with that, it seems that a generic ohci_fdt driver isn't possible=
.
>>>>>=20
>>>>> Warner
>>>>>=20
>>>>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 2:01 AM, Stanislav Galabov <sgalabov@gmail.com=

>>> <mailto:sgalabov@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>=20
>>>>> First off, sorry for the cross-post, I wasn=E2=80=99t very sure where t=
his
>>> should go=E2=80=A6
>>>>>=20
>>>>> I=E2=80=99ve created 3 PRs, which enable some functionality that my wo=
rk on
>>> Ralink/Mediatek SoCs would benefit from.
>>>>>=20
>>>>> 1. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D206227 <
>>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D206227>;
>>>>> - This enables geom_flashmap and fdt_slicer support for SPI flash chip=
s
>>> supported by the mx25l driver (sys/dev/flash/mx25l.c)
>>>>>=20
>>>>> 2. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D206228 <
>>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D206228>;
>>>>> - This adds support for FDT =E2=80=98resets=3D=E2=80=99 property in mu=
ch the same way as
>>> ian@=E2=80=99s sys/dev/fdt/fdt_clock* supports FDT =E2=80=98clocks=3D=E2=
=80=98 property. In fact
>>> this work is basically a modified version of fdt_clock* :-)
>>>>>=20
>>>>> 3. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D206229 <
>>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D206229>;
>>>>> - This simply moves the at91 specific sys/dev/usb/controller/ohci_fdt.=
c
>>> to sys/dev/usb/controller/at91ohci_fdt.c (and changes the filename in
>>> sys/arm/at91/files.at91 as well). The current naming is misleading IMHO a=
nd
>>> also, I have some (vague-ish) plans to see if I can implement generic
>>> ohci_fdt and ehci_fdt based on dwc_otg_fdt, so that systems with standar=
d
>>> ehci/ohci controllers can reuse these.
>>>>>=20
>>>>> Patches are attached to the PRs.
>>>>>=20
>>>>> I would appreciate any feedback on the PRs and would also appreciate i=
t
>>> if someone could commit these if the proposed changes are appropriate.
>>>>>=20
>>>>> Best wishes,
>>>>> Stanislav
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> freebsd-arm@freebsd.org <mailto:freebsd-arm@freebsd.org> mailing list
>>>>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm <
>>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm>;
>>>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org
>>> <mailto:freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org>"
>>>>=20
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list
>>>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm
>>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list
>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-mips@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-mips
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-mips-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?57E542F6-FCF2-4E51-9FE5-8EDD85DA2102>