Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 05:28:20 +0100 From: Palle Girgensohn <girgen@partitur.se> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Shall we accept /usr/X11R6/LessTif ? Message-ID: <36F1D264.DC390F0@partitur.se>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! I have made an update of the lesstif port (to 0.88.0). Since Lesstif nowadays have code for both Motif-1.2 and 2.0, the hungry programmers have decided to put all includes and libs into this structure: /usr/X11R6/LessTif /usr/X11R6/LessTif/Motif1.2 /usr/X11R6/LessTif/Motif1.2/include /usr/X11R6/LessTif/Motif1.2/include/Xm /usr/X11R6/LessTif/Motif1.2/include/Mrm /usr/X11R6/LessTif/Motif1.2/lib /usr/X11R6/LessTif/Motif2.0 /usr/X11R6/LessTif/Motif2.0/include /usr/X11R6/LessTif/Motif2.0/include/Xm /usr/X11R6/LessTif/Motif2.0/include/Mrm and symlink from X11R6/[include|lib]/[lib][Mrm|Xm]* to the version of choice (chosen with configure). Anybody vote against this? I personally don't like cluttering the $PREFIX dirs with more stuff, but I see no better way. Splitting it up into /usr/X11/include/lesstiff-x.x or similar seems like a bad idea. Maybe just installing 1.2, skipping 2.0 support, would help, but that seems a bit retarded :) Ideas? I noone cares I'll send the port update via gnats this weekend. /Palle To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?36F1D264.DC390F0>