From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 20 01:50:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E034D16A41F for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 01:50:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chat95@mac.com) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.47]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F75D43D45 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 01:50:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chat95@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin08-en2 [10.13.10.153]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout09/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id k0K1oM4B013889; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 17:50:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([133.11.172.102]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin08/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id k0K1oIsC011113; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 17:50:20 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 10:50:06 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20060120.105006.85353533.chat95@mac.com> To: nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de From: NAKATA Maho In-Reply-To: <20060119192137.GB13509@saturn.kn-bremen.de> References: <20060118.093740.41689767.chat95@mac.com> <20060119192137.GB13509@saturn.kn-bremen.de> Organization: private X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: qemu hack X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 01:50:23 -0000 In Message-ID: <20060119192137.GB13509@saturn.kn-bremen.de> Juergen Lock wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 09:37:40AM +0900, NAKATA Maho wrote: > > Dear Juergen and list, > > I add a hack for qemu port; speed up hack of cirrus vga. > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2006-01/msg00208.html > > and now qemu seems to be faster a bit. > > (hope someone can do benchmark) > > > > Juergen, can I commit to port? > > Well you didnt bump PORTREVISION, also you could call patch with --quiet Right. According to http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.html > PORTREVISION should be increased each time a change is made to the port which significantly affects the content or structure of the derived package. > Changes to MASTER_SITES or other functional changes to the port which do not affect the resulting package. My understanding is adding a knob do not affect the resulting packages since I didn't change anything when installing with `make install' (but make -DWITH_HACKS install). I took this way - since adding unofficial patches are considered as minor project fork and as you found below, there might be a side effects as well. IMHO any patch should be upstreamed otherwise we should fork the project. so I merely added as a knob. > for the patch3_cirrus file. Other than that its ok with me... okay. > I do get redraw artefacts with the patch when I play with the scrollbar > on the konqueror that comes up right when I boot the kanotix livecd > iso in qemu tho: > http://debian.tu-bs.de/kanotix/KANOTIX-2005-04/KANOTIX-2005-04.iso ;) oh sincerely yours, -- NAKATA, Maho (maho@FreeBSD.org)