From owner-freebsd-current Thu Apr 11 18:23:22 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from scaup.prod.itd.earthlink.net (scaup.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0EB837B419; Thu, 11 Apr 2002 18:23:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pool0186.cvx22-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([209.179.198.186] helo=mindspring.com) by scaup.prod.itd.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 16vpmU-0001J1-00; Thu, 11 Apr 2002 18:23:14 -0700 Message-ID: <3CB636E7.FB2D8B93@mindspring.com> Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 18:22:47 -0700 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en]C-CCK-MCD {Sony} (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Maksim Yevmenkin Cc: Jeffrey Hsu , current@FreeBSD.org, net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Bug in m_split() ? References: <0GUF00L9TDCRFW@mta7.pltn13.pbi.net> <3CB612FF.2B05330F@digisle.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: > it does _exactly_ the same thing as patch i sent. the idea is > to set "n->m_len" to zero. in this particular part of the code > "n" is not modified. only "n->m_next". so i do not see any > difference except your patch is 4 lines :) Yours is less efficient. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message