Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 00:36:28 -0500 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> To: Adam Weinberger <adamw@freebsd.org> Cc: Murray Stokely <murray@freebsdmall.com> Subject: Re: fam Message-ID: <1111210588.41721.42.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> In-Reply-To: <423B9EE4.1090706@FreeBSD.org> References: <20050319030449.GG4271@freebsdmall.com> <423B9EE4.1090706@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-b9mItwQZuzj94v9lihz7 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 22:39 -0500, Adam Weinberger wrote: > Murray Stokely wrote: > > How important is fam to GNOME. Should we add a commented out entry to > > inetd.conf? Any comment on PR: conf/74004? > >=20 > > - Murray >=20 > What I'd like to see more than anything is a set of step-by-step=20 > instructions for getting fam up and running. I tried at one point, and=20 > couldn't get it to work right. If there were a handbook entry that gave=20 > step-by-step instructions, or a more complete pkg-message in the fam=20 > port itself, I wouldn't think that an inetd.conf entry is even necessary. FAM is pretty easy to deploy these days. All that's needed is the inetd.conf entry, then killall -HUP inetd. I really think we should consider teaching fam to do its own activation. We could make it an optional knob in the Makefile. Joe >=20 > # Adam >=20 >=20 --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-b9mItwQZuzj94v9lihz7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCO7pcb2iPiv4Uz4cRApHVAJ0QfNuxSCl87bQF+j6iiP+oCjlDQgCgp48F ZYgbPJGp6Tk8yuDNt8sqSac= =l+lx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-b9mItwQZuzj94v9lihz7--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1111210588.41721.42.camel>