From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 3 19:56:53 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E96516A400; Sat, 3 Mar 2007 19:56:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dunstan@freebsd.czest.pl) Received: from freebsd.czest.pl (freebsd.czest.pl [80.48.250.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88AC513C461; Sat, 3 Mar 2007 19:56:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dunstan@freebsd.czest.pl) Received: from freebsd.czest.pl (freebsd.czest.pl [80.48.250.4]) by freebsd.czest.pl (8.13.4/8.12.9) with ESMTP id l23KQX2P014165; Sat, 3 Mar 2007 20:26:34 GMT (envelope-from dunstan@freebsd.czest.pl) Received: (from dunstan@localhost) by freebsd.czest.pl (8.13.4/8.12.9/Submit) id l23KQWLY014164; Sat, 3 Mar 2007 20:26:32 GMT (envelope-from dunstan) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 20:26:30 +0000 From: "Wojciech A. Koszek" To: Alessandro de Manzano Message-ID: <20070303202630.GA14147@FreeBSD.czest.pl> References: <20070302084747.GA80114@libero.sunshine.ale> <0596BF936C9E2F724954C223@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20070303175317.GA89496@libero.sunshine.ale> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070303175317.GA89496@libero.sunshine.ale> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Greylist: Sender DNS name whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (freebsd.czest.pl [80.48.250.4]); Sat, 03 Mar 2007 20:26:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Paul Schmehl , freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: two problems with broadcom NICs X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2007 19:56:53 -0000 On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 06:53:17PM +0100, Alessandro de Manzano wrote: > On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 02:37:50PM -0600, Paul Schmehl wrote: > > > Shouldn't you be using the bce driver? This is an i386 machine, but amd64 > > should work the same (you're using the same chipset): > > well, actually I have that driver in my kernel but it does not get > attached (tried both i386 and x64 kernel) > > Looking for that card id it seems indeed a bge-supported card in > -CURRENT (browswed the cvs commit archive for poweredge SC440), problem > is if/when it will be supported in RELENG_6... > > Many thanks for your answer! You might want to generate a patch for RELENG_6 for yourself, if it's a matter of quirk with proper ID. This should only apply if probe method doesn't return true in your case, and none other changes were made to support your specific device. -- Wojciech A. Koszek wkoszek@FreeBSD.org http://FreeBSD.czest.pl/dunstan/