From owner-freebsd-fs Thu Dec 9 11:49:12 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from pmr.com (pmr.pmr.com [216.140.144.138]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CDA115675 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 1999 11:49:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rbg@pmr.com) Received: from jeeves (jeeves.pmr.com [207.170.114.16]) by pmr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA92897 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 1999 13:38:56 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from rbg@pmr.com) Message-ID: <008401bf427f$81ccb6a0$1072aacf@pmr.com> Reply-To: "Robert Gordon" From: "Robert Gordon" To: Subject: Clustered Read/writes and NFS.. Date: Thu, 9 Dec 1999 13:56:39 -0600 Organization: PMR MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello, I'm attempting to understand if the NFS implementation takes advantage of clustered read/writes. So far I see that if NFS needs a buf that (via getnewbuf()) a call could be made to vfs_bio_awrite() which could cause a clustered write to free up some buffers... but I don't see that NFS takes advantage of a clustered read/write.... Thanks, Robert........................ rbg@pmr.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message