From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jan 30 14:32:58 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id OAA11638 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 30 Jan 1996 14:32:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from rocky.sri.MT.net (rocky.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.10]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id OAA11626 for ; Tue, 30 Jan 1996 14:32:41 -0800 (PST) Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.sri.MT.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id PAA13313; Tue, 30 Jan 1996 15:35:13 -0700 Date: Tue, 30 Jan 1996 15:35:13 -0700 From: Nate Williams Message-Id: <199601302235.PAA13313@rocky.sri.MT.net> To: kline@tera.com (Gary Kline) Cc: nate@sri.MT.net (Nate Williams), freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mysterious reboots In-Reply-To: <9601302224.AA23066@tera.com> References: <199601301844.LAA12452@rocky.sri.MT.net> <9601302224.AA23066@tera.com> Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk Gary Kline writes: > According to Nate Williams: > > > > [ Make a patch that brings -stable up to today's patch-level ] > > > > [[ &c re 2.1 ]] > > Arrrgh, I think I'll wait a few (to a few + N) weeks > before I upgrade... . I'll be watching to see when > 2.1.N really is stable! 2.1 *is* really stable. Why do you think it isn't? I'm just planning on make a one-shot (kernel-only + whatever else is necessary) patch to allow folks easy access to the bugs fixed in the -stable branch since 2.1R. The main thing updated the updated Adaptec driver code, although I will try and summarize the changes when I make them available. Nate