From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Tue Apr 12 07:10:49 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F262B0CC68 for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:10:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (phk.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58E6C1E5C; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:10:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (unknown [192.168.55.3]) by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14FC54FB03; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:10:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u3C7AjGb020380; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:10:46 GMT (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) To: Peter Grehan cc: "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: -current host, 10.1 client loops In-reply-to: <570C74CF.1080702@freebsd.org> From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" References: <20918.1458052609@critter.freebsd.dk> <23329.1458077441@critter.freebsd.dk> <28223.1458163559@critter.freebsd.dk> <723.1460154499@critter.freebsd.dk> <570B3604.8020500@freebsd.org> <16580.1460397200@critter.freebsd.dk> <570C74CF.1080702@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <20378.1460445045.1@critter.freebsd.dk> Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:10:45 +0000 Message-ID: <20379.1460445045@critter.freebsd.dk> X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:10:49 -0000 -------- In message <570C74CF.1080702@freebsd.org>, Peter Grehan writes: > I'll try with a bit more CPU oversubscription and see if I can hit >this. Thanks for the info - this should help track it down. For what its worth, I think the port being compiled was: /usr/ports/www/p5-Mozilla-CAnss Another possibly relevant datapoint: The actively being written to filesystem is UFS+SU+TRIM but no journal and I think fsck sees more and worse corruption than it should if writes happened in the order Kirk intended. Specifically it should never get fsck_ffs into the "please run fsck again" jungle. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.