From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 12 16:24:41 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16E3316A4D1 for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 16:24:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9E0C43D1F for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 16:24:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [192.168.254.11] (junior-wifi.samsco.home [192.168.254.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j3CGRtB7038581; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 10:27:59 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <425BF587.5070904@samsco.org> Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 10:21:27 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050218 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Edwin Groothuis References: <20050412130727.GE1209@k7.mavetju> In-Reply-To: <20050412130727.GE1209@k7.mavetju> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on pooker.samsco.org cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Adaptec 1210 weird behaviour X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 16:24:41 -0000 Edwin Groothuis wrote: > The Adaptec 1210 is a serial ATA RAID0/1 controller. > > When the two disks are configured as RAID1, FreeBSD still sees two > harddisks instead of one. > > This is with 5.3. Scary :-) > Will try this weekend with 5.4 > The 1210 is not a real RAID controller, it's a SATA controller with an Adaptec BIOS that does RAID 0 and 1 during boot. It's up to the OS to do the RAID operations after that. The new ATA driver in 6-current might actually be able to handle this, so it's worth trying. 5.4 definitely will not. Scott