From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jun 26 18:25:26 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD08916A421;
	Tue, 26 Jun 2007 18:25:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sam@errno.com)
Received: from ebb.errno.com (ebb.errno.com [69.12.149.25])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 912BD13C44C;
	Tue, 26 Jun 2007 18:25:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sam@errno.com)
Received: from trouble.errno.com (trouble.errno.com [10.0.0.248])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by ebb.errno.com (8.13.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id l5QIPP5l006308
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Tue, 26 Jun 2007 11:25:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sam@errno.com)
Message-ID: <46815A9D.5010803@errno.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 11:27:41 -0700
From: Sam Leffler <sam@errno.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070530)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Nathan Whitehorn <nathanw@uchicago.edu>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.62.0706261134500.10843@harper.uchicago.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.62.0706261134500.10843@harper.uchicago.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Netatalk and named broken on arm?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor <freebsd-arm.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 18:25:26 -0000

Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
> I'm having problems with both netatalk and named on my Avila system -- 
> in particular AARP seems to be broken (it sends out bogus packets asking 
> about address 0.0.0 from 0.0, and it works on other big-endian systems 
> like sparc64), and named hangs when starting. Are these known problems, 
> and do they have known solutions?

Not sure about named but it's unlikely anyone has tried netatalk.

	Sam