From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 9 18:18:35 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73D8637B401 for ; Fri, 9 May 2003 18:18:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pittgoth.com (14.zlnp1.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.149.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CCA943FD7 for ; Fri, 9 May 2003 18:18:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mobile.pittgoth.com ([192.168.0.5]) by pittgoth.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h4A1ISZK062735; Fri, 9 May 2003 21:18:33 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 21:15:07 -0400 From: Tom Rhodes To: Christian Brueffer Message-Id: <20030509211507.5b0b54f1.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20030508231909.GO609@unixpages.org> References: <20030508134407.638ff0c9.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> <20030508231909.GO609@unixpages.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.10claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: PR: docs/37221 && docs/51886: mount_nfs(8) options. X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 01:18:35 -0000 On Fri, 9 May 2003 01:19:09 +0200 Christian Brueffer wrote: > On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 01:44:07PM -0400, Tom Rhodes wrote: > > Josh, Lars, > > > > After looking over this a little closer, I'm totally lost at why these > > PRs were filed. > > > > -p is listed in the manual page as a historic and deprecated option. > > -P is listed in the manual page as obsolete. > > > > I can understand removing them both from the usage message, however > > they seem to be documented fine in the manual page (as obsolete). > > > > Currently I have an email in to murray and bmah about this, and > > my personal opinion is that the manual page is fine. > > > > Any opinions on just removing the -P and -p option from the code > > and leaving the manual page as is? What do the other -doc committers > > think about this? > > > > Apparently mbr removed ISO support from the code a while ago (which > didn't work anyway) and these are leftovers. > It's not fatal if this stays in, but as it's something that isn't > even implemented anymore, it would be nice to be thrown out. > Cool, and I talked to bmah about it also. I've got a fairly good idea how I'll handle this. Thanks. -- Tom Rhodes