From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 27 07:40:01 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FB0B892 for ; Tue, 27 May 2014 07:40:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E06628B8 for ; Tue, 27 May 2014 07:40:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s4R7e06f041891 for ; Tue, 27 May 2014 07:40:00 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8/Submit) id s4R7e0Sk041890; Tue, 27 May 2014 07:40:00 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 07:40:00 GMT Message-Id: <201405270740.s4R7e0Sk041890@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: milki Subject: Re: ports/190284: port update: sysutils/cpulimit Reply-To: milki X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 07:40:01 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/190284; it has been noted by GNATS. From: milki To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, jessefrgsmith@yahoo.ca Cc: swills@FreeBSD.org, eadler@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/190284: port update: sysutils/cpulimit Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 00:25:58 -0700 --s2ZSL+KKDSLx8OML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Jesse, This update seems to be overloaded. 2.2 is now pointing to a new fork of the original cpulimit while cpulimit has been relaunched on github. Would it be more wise to split this port into two with sysutils/limitcpu =66rom http://limitcpu.sourceforge.net/ and sysutils/cpulimit from https://github.com/opsengine/cpulimit ? --=20 milki ports committer in training --s2ZSL+KKDSLx8OML Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJThD4GXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ3Q0QwMTIyMTg2NjczNDQ5QkJDM0I0NjNB MzFENUNBMEY3RTdDMDkyAAoJEKMdXKD358CSmMoIAKLDnG24yaoerxdiORaqNEbu DEll6pP79jKIysbwJUlC0aW8Gd/AyOO8Fb/sgM8LD2xfKVYinaJfUO8AWokjE2f7 HstOLGSdmViQL3xxZtsbytPA8LFDgWMGYqQipW92pBbfK9eZ4tUR4cHLBahG4HGA 1ot0E8WIvRBsTK+6B3QxVI0c5JFmpfIB8a8+KSBymUKaGQkD6d/irHgGqN7lW8hZ 5H7l6YSfFcVdUSOPnDcoZ9EOrbIgXl6B5Xa3pp3w3rlKybb1r7ERXf4lJDgIUIom 1KM3poWxNny6OlCmnQBw8lK+XmY0ECXqy3nfOBfPiHrSvVim/N0cXJcyqwdioII= =TvC4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --s2ZSL+KKDSLx8OML--