From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 20 19:20:54 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CA0D16A41F for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 19:20:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from yertle.kcilink.com (yertle.kcilink.com [65.205.34.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F40E43D66 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 19:20:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from [192.168.7.103] (host-103.int.kcilink.com [192.168.7.103]) by yertle.kcilink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F665B80C for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 15:20:53 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v734) In-Reply-To: <20051019231046.1136a1ea.dick@nagual.st> References: <200510152346.RAA20742@lariat.net> <20051016135752.6bcc6874.dick@nagual.st> <20051019231046.1136a1ea.dick@nagual.st> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <57B3E41C-8880-4ED4-B33C-321DE5ED9AD1@khera.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Vivek Khera Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 15:20:52 -0400 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.734) Subject: Re: 6.0 release date and stability X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 19:20:54 -0000 On Oct 19, 2005, at 5:10 PM, dick hoogendijk wrote: > Wat is the best way to get the cleanest FreeBSD-6.x system without > installing from scratch? Recompile each port? Or use the > COMPAT_FREEBSD5 layer? > > this is a different question than you asked before... the COMPAT_FREEBSD5 will allow your existing binaries to continue to run. you can leave this on while you run "portupgrade -f -a" to recompile all your ports, then you can take it out... and remove all the compat libraries sitting around if you care to do so. personally, I don't see the point of doing that. just let your ports naturally get replaced as they are upgraded due to version bumps and such.