From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 7 07:34:52 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7B381065697 for ; Fri, 7 Nov 2008 07:34:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gabriele.cecchetti@gmail.com) Received: from rn-out-0910.google.com (rn-out-0910.google.com [64.233.170.187]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B5488FC1A for ; Fri, 7 Nov 2008 07:34:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gabriele.cecchetti@gmail.com) Received: by rn-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id j71so815538rne.12 for ; Thu, 06 Nov 2008 23:34:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:reply-to :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from; bh=ElhdfbXno4iM+f9nPuPBZ2O6ko2ec5G3Voj34bafvek=; b=fK71lJa0NWwwqkwhiiYLi+AMo26q8z52MpXv5XTsOlH4OVP051gChvv+n0+jmm7l0Q N9zLEptvb+25wtm0D5tn0YhenhZ9FZgaAqcAmjGsmyScOZMGdlFT18NWQtA6UOTXDJhh 3jtiiRc1NkKhR6wWMUST5NECPEe96DmuFSgMc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from; b=aoKTccbL5ZugCC9SbcsxSYEsZSUe8FVeADTZce0nt2Cn7Lw4/1+ZIuN8NmpBSv3uTe 6KWMbI/apXPPev9Fvr1eDYAfZLW17f4TxAkRadECD2b2bBRXKXBZBW8snYHnmHV6GbSX r07+2373kV7iGjwBfuzI354FCHl2CIA8Hefyg= Received: by 10.231.33.129 with SMTP id h1mr1329741ibd.33.1226043291352; Thu, 06 Nov 2008 23:34:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.110? (S0106001884a238dd.vc.shawcable.net [24.80.22.226]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k41sm3609500rvb.4.2008.11.06.23.34.49 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 06 Nov 2008 23:34:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4913EF93.6010006@sssup.it> Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2008 23:34:43 -0800 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pyunyh@gmail.com References: <49133B35.9040603@sssup.it> <20081107072201.GD11486@cdnetworks.co.kr> In-Reply-To: <20081107072201.GD11486@cdnetworks.co.kr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Gabriele Cecchetti Cc: Fabio Checconi , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Panics and freeze using age0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: g.cecchetti@sssup.it List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2008 07:34:52 -0000 Pyun YongHyeon ha scritto: [...] > Would you be more elaborate on this issue? Does it mean you have > to manually up/down game with ifconfig(8) after boot? Yes, I need to do that. Sometimes happen that even if the interface is showed during the bootlog, then it is not showed by ifconfig. Typing ifconfig again show the interface. Then I've to down/up the interface and/or ping outside, like the interface was sleeping. > > Anyone with similar experience ? > > age0 driver is well tested for production enviroment or not ? > [...] > > Is better to buy another Intel card and going on using em0 driver ? > > Remember, all hardwares supported by age(4) are for consumer > motherboards. Even if L1 has much better performance/design than > that of its successor, L1E, it's still not for server market. > The same is true for em(4). Since there are too many variants you > may have to choose the best hardware model that is suited for your > workload. The other card I'm using is: em0@pci0:5:1:0: class=0x020000 card=0x13768086 chip=0x107c8086 rev=0x05 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = 'PRO/1000 GT' class = network subclass = ethernet So, which card is the best buy for the server market ? Cheers Gabriele