Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 23:20:46 -0500 From: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> To: Zaphod Beeblebrox <zbeeble@gmail.com> Cc: "Eugene M. Kim" <freebsd.org@ab.ote.we.lv>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dump(8) performance Message-ID: <20060603042046.GA19262@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <5f67a8c40605310953h27bf170oa474200cd4b93c03@mail.gmail.com> References: <447DB0B1.8040206@ab.ote.we.lv> <20060531153029.GE6982@dan.emsphone.com> <447DBA44.1060605@ab.ote.we.lv> <5f67a8c40605310953h27bf170oa474200cd4b93c03@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In the last episode (May 31), Zaphod Beeblebrox said: > On 5/31/06, Eugene M. Kim <freebsd.org@ab.ote.we.lv> wrote: > >Dan Nelson wrote: > >> Are you using the -C option to dump? I would expact that to help > >> more in the "dumping directories" step, but it might help later > >> phases too. > > > >Yep, -C32. > > I'm a pretty big fan of using team (ports/misc/team). Team > implements a ring buffer for the output of dump. Is the -C argument > an output buffer or a buffer at some other level of the process? It's a read cache. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060603042046.GA19262>