From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Sep 3 12:19:31 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from assurance.rstcorp.com (assurance.rstcorp.com [216.112.242.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D099914EFA for ; Fri, 3 Sep 1999 12:19:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from vshah@rstcorp.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by assurance.rstcorp.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA29448 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 1999 15:16:45 -0400 Received: from proxy.rstcorp.com(216.112.242.5) by assurance.rstcorp.com via smap (V2.0) id xma029438; Fri, 3 Sep 99 19:16:12 GMT Received: from jabberwock.rstcorp.com (jabberwock.rstcorp.com [192.168.2.98]) by sandbox.rstcorp.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA11402 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 1999 15:15:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from vshah@localhost) by jabberwock.rstcorp.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA45688; Fri, 3 Sep 1999 15:16:02 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from vshah@rstcorp.com) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14288.7794.1975.690537@jabberwock.rstcorp.com> Date: Fri, 3 Sep 1999 15:16:02 -0400 (EDT) From: "Viren R. Shah" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: rpc.statd -- memory hog? X-Mailer: VM 6.72 under 19.16 "Lille" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: "Viren R. Shah" X-Face: )~y+U*K:yzjz{q<5lzpI_SVef'U.])9g[C9`1N@]u3,MHY7f*l7C)[_NjM4y4K8$uIUh|\u (K&&HS6,M!61&GMTk'mqmB/Qg]]X}"?TzsFl]"2v!bl8']dma.:^IY^a[lbOI>U:b<~FyK3q-p{HmZ mn~g.`~BE!5{2D:}Yi+\_KkWe?XaHj9$ko1k8iKLYv5*_2c8"G=?Up[}hn+7RNM(bzBZ_wWk6!Pf&B ?3Tcm7M7B~W%K/I0aX3]*=jP?aM]H6HBPT`oLk+0n^_;N\2\%|Rhy;p}34Q.jEsM\qtnxcm;ag%Nq Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG We are running an NFS server (3.2-STABLE from July 29). It only allows v2/UDP connections. I just looked at the ps output for rpc.statd and saw: USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TT STAT STARTED TIME COMMAND root 156 0.0 0.2 262968 256 ?? Is Mon05PM 0:00.21 rpc.statd The box has only been up for: 3:13PM up 3 days, 22:01, 9 users, load averages: 0.08, 0.15, 0.07 [It also serves only about a dozen clients] Is there a reason why it should be taking up that much memory (even though it's all virtual memory, and it's residential size is only 256) Thanks Viren -- Viren R. Shah, viren@rstcorp.com, http://www.rstcorp.com/~vshah `Twas brillig, and the slithy toves did gyre and gimble in the wabe; All mimsy were the borogoves, and the mome raths outgrabe.' -- Lewis Carroll (Jabberwocky) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message