From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jul  7 08:35:03 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 236314BB
 for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sun,  7 Jul 2013 08:35:03 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from andre@freebsd.org)
Received: from c00l3r.networx.ch (c00l3r.networx.ch [62.48.2.2])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F4A71A9E
 for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sun,  7 Jul 2013 08:35:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 56551 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2013 09:26:15 -0000
Received: from c00l3r.networx.ch (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([62.48.2.2])
 (envelope-sender <andre@freebsd.org>)
 by c00l3r.networx.ch (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
 for <alfred@ixsystems.com>; 7 Jul 2013 09:26:15 -0000
Message-ID: <51D92826.1070707@freebsd.org>
Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2013 10:34:46 +0200
From: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@ixsystems.com>
Subject: Re: status of autotuning freebsd for 9.2
References: <51D90B9B.9080209@ixsystems.com>
In-Reply-To: <51D90B9B.9080209@ixsystems.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: stable@freebsd.org, re@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2013 08:35:03 -0000

On 07.07.2013 08:32, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> Andre,
>
> Are you going to have time to MFC things from -current for auto-tuning -stable before 9.2?

I simply ran out of time on Friday and MFCing such a big change requires
more testing.

> I fear (maybe unnecessarily?) that we are about to ship yet another release that can't do basic
> 10gigE when sufficient memory exists.

There was some debate with myself whether such a behavior changing MFC
would be appropriate for a mid-stream stable release.  I guess yes, though
a number of people who currently set the parameters manually would have
to remove their tuning settings.

> If you don't have time, then let me know and I'll see what I can do.

Can you help me with with testing?

-- 
Andre