Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 14:02:48 -0500 From: AlanE <alane@geeksrus.net> To: AlanE <alane@geeksrus.net> Cc: Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.ORG>, Trevor Johnson <trevor@jpj.net>, Anders Andersson <anders@hack.org>, Alexis Georges <floating_in_space_@hotmail.com>, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PLEASE test phoenix 0.4_3, just committed. Message-ID: <20021104190248.GB9878@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> In-Reply-To: <20021104182637.GA4787@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> References: <20021104113126.GL197@vectors.cx> <20021104063249.Q50593-100000@blues.jpj.net> <20021104130319.GN197@vectors.cx> <20021104182637.GA4787@wwweasel.geeksrus.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 01:26:37PM -0500, AlanE wrote: >On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 05:03:19AM -0800, Adam Weinberger wrote: >>>> (11.04.2002 @ 0404 PST): Trevor Johnson said, in 1.0K: << >>> I see what you mean. I think Alan is trying to make it possible, but it >>> isn't quite complete yet. You probably noticed that he has set it up to >>> install the p5-File-Spec port for people who have an old version of Perl >>> that doesn't come with File/Spec.pm. Perl 5.6.1 has its own File::Spec, >>> which is (apparently) new enough for Phoenix's purposes, yet I had runtime >>> problems before after building with Perl 5.6.1 (I didn't see those error >>> messages) and you had runtime problems now when building after 5.005_03. >>> Now it's just a simple matter of finding where the problems come from. :-) >>>> end of "Re: XML Parsing error with Phoenix 0.4.2" from Trevor Johnson << >> >>I can't diagnose much more tonight as it's 4:45a and I'm really tired >>and sick of watching phoenix re-extract again and again ::P >> >>I've found a difference that may point in a useful direction: >> >>When 5.005_03 is used, XP_UNIX doesn't get defined. However, it does >>when 5.8.0 is used. > >That's a clue. I have committed an update to 0.4_3, which defines >XP_UNIX for both the configure and the make. I have downgraded my >system to 5.6.1 and am testing here (can you say 2 hour build?); I >would appreciate other people testing this as well. > >When reporting results, we need to know: > >1. Base perl or port. >2. If port, did you do the command "use.perl port"? >3. If port, WHICH port? >4. Results, both configure/build anomolies and runtime glitches, > separated out into those two categories. > >Send results to phoenix@geeksrus.net. I screwed up the Makefile. It's fixed now. Please grab the port again. -- Alan Eldridge Unix/C(++) IT Pro for 20 yrs, seeking new employment. (http://wwweasel.geeksrus.net/~alane/resume.txt) KDE, KDE-FreeBSD Teams (http://www.kde.org, http://freebsd.kde.org/) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021104190248.GB9878>