From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 19 20:17:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A9E4106564A for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 20:17:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from millenia2000@hotmail.com) Received: from bay0-omc4-s16.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc4-s16.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.190.218]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B8F18FC0A for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 20:17:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BAY165-DS11 ([65.54.190.199]) by bay0-omc4-s16.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 19 Jun 2012 13:16:34 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [174.252.106.27] X-Originating-Email: [millenia2000@hotmail.com] Message-ID: From: Sean Cavanaugh To: "'Wojciech Puchar'" , "'Polytropon'" References: <402199FE-380B-41B6-866B-7D5D66C457D5@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <20120619205225.21d6709f.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 16:16:31 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-index: AQHp4KT3cHm5cc0DCVfi/q+foR9f0AKEiFigAXFYrcQB/5p/ogINI54SlojZsBA= Content-Language: en-us X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Jun 2012 20:16:34.0946 (UTC) FILETIME=[6C95D620:01CD4E58] Cc: 'FreeBSD Questions' Subject: RE: Why Clang X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 20:17:39 -0000 > > i wouldn't be surprised that FreeBSD team would decide to go back to gcc > soon. > I would as one of the driving forces of the change was to replace GPL licensed code in FreeBSD core with more permissive licensed code. This helps to remove a massive legal encumberment for a lot of developers who no longer have to worry how their BSD licensed code has to be treated if its compiled thru a GPL compiler.