From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Sun Nov 27 19:59:46 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 035CAC59E18 for ; Sun, 27 Nov 2016 19:59:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dcrosstech@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-x231.google.com (mail-yw0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFB3A942 for ; Sun, 27 Nov 2016 19:59:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dcrosstech@gmail.com) Received: by mail-yw0-x231.google.com with SMTP id t125so99688203ywc.1 for ; Sun, 27 Nov 2016 11:59:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=U3y3I53NtS4TA8IEGJTlyCyEvTG2MqbphTK1xOHmyyk=; b=NgrVIAUjnRiA7aMJloqnDr0Cf2OjUuLBbNjIpzewaeGLItST6VQgPdcvGw5hsGQlIh jlGF5xfhF2gKxRHtcoynsqu2irjTXXhlvsfcflaWTnNddGuG7pVbCVrTPChDqpQJ7AUM ppHs1mMLEfR0taCL15Qq6mZggoFkvWANZtfGrs8I+x9LIxtVMPmplisLvGQOf/KnMHN3 hgrpC1+hpCvIsT3Uw/ipWAIz/5SL7nlTFk7jX0RyVr+Bfyz5uS/98/xY6ASkjOs5Ygnk WsB8MMZxDF+2YRa2vhLt/p+S50vGc47JFRaf4/n7v63hM0lKMhQMrZZ1ctve4tsjhO9W ODwA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=U3y3I53NtS4TA8IEGJTlyCyEvTG2MqbphTK1xOHmyyk=; b=c0CO7zIMbcsvCEnLLajh7btBCFMpwIUEsh5Er5h7tiTzbuvPrKEW/06zr28vLdhz86 AzhVUwsH1/J1sYD0wioYUOPg4nET5X17CDRU1j7xfiPBveMzozz6ZvOAxDrStsnKNSQE zbuW7EViiTIErUuYML3oldXBZweRFkfhr8U0HAj0kI0UOGZD5G9hM5mI5WYDUplfNd2S DhKc51rEGreCAv98+WH65jMCT0YyUWgDoF7ctOtG/MbDHmQJZSz8U5so6R+oY1RYtob8 yqwsOu1IQtXBiDBycQGOnujJwBSevpZgB5MaWcK4n5PGVSJMvEjASEOICkgDZ9V0cpIc 4YKg== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC01+OMCnfQk5/UorBZk216bnyL86wpW/B00r0GeT2im/CevRA79qoJPH0TvtD7yPPjXujwZh7i0n0xR2FQ== X-Received: by 10.13.227.3 with SMTP id m3mr21404115ywe.272.1480276784852; Sun, 27 Nov 2016 11:59:44 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.37.201.197 with HTTP; Sun, 27 Nov 2016 11:59:44 -0800 (PST) From: David Cross Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2016 14:59:44 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD 11 sparc64 instability To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2016 19:59:46 -0000 On 2016-11-21 22:11:45, Allan Jude wrote: > Try running: uname -K and uname -U > > This will print the API versions of your kernel and userland. If they do > not match, this is definitely the source of your issues. Given at this point I was running GENERIC from install images pulled down from ftp.freebsd.org, I would certainly hope they were in sync, nevertheless, here's the output: uname -K 1100122 uname -U 1100122 It seems this should be *trivial* for anyone to reproduce who has a sparc64 machine. Boot machine, load ipfw (standard caveats apply here, you want console access), ipfw -a list, get error message. If you still have a 10.3 ipfw use that next. the fsck test is a bit more involved to test, but I feel here people are playing with fire... their systems will work perfectly until they get a crash, and then their FS is toast.