From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 22 17:20:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0275C16A4CE; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 17:20:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (transport.cksoft.de [62.111.66.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0BD843D55; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 17:20:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FD761FFDC1; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 19:20:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id 61C7E1FF931; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 19:20:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix, from userid 1060) id E2D641559A; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 17:18:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7D83154E5; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 17:18:24 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 17:18:24 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net To: Hajimu UMEMOTO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20040622153207.GB1961@empiric.dek.spc.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS cksoft-s20020300-20031204bz on transport.cksoft.de cc: wietse@porcupine.org cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: tcp_wrappers: accumulated change-request PRs X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 17:20:20 -0000 On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > >>>>> On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:32:07 +0100 > >>>>> Bruce M Simpson said: > > bms> Whilst scanning GNATS, I found a number of PRs relating to requests > bms> for tcp_wrappers functionality and some outright bugfixes. Rather than > bms> commit these as-is, I think we should push the changes back to Wietse, > bms> as we maintain tcp_wrappers on a vendor branch. > > bms> The PRs in question are: > bms> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/31034 > bms> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/32808 > bms> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=misc/36556 > bms> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=misc/42336 > > bms> What does everyone else think? > > Many part of our code is already off a vender branch since IPv6 > support, and it seems Wietse doesn't maintain tcp_wrappers actively. Post from Wietse (who is on Cc: as I see) about this from yesterday ... http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=postfix-users&m=108784059323250&w=2 /me remebers to have sent some patches to Wietse in 2002 that luckily didn't get comitted though CIDR notation is pretty nice ;-) -- Greetings Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT