From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 16 20:02:40 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E85616A41F for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 20:02:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C52043D69 for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 20:02:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 727661A3C27; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 12:02:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CB2BB51257; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 15:02:38 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 15:02:38 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: delphij@delphij.net Message-ID: <20051216200238.GA92404@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <43A26FFB.9080405@samsco.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Scott Long , hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: My wish list for 6.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 20:02:40 -0000 --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 02:22:36AM +0800, Xin LI wrote: > Hi, Scott, >=20 > On 12/16/05, Scott Long wrote: > > Guys, > > > > With code freeze for 6.1 about 6 weeks away, I'd like to put out my > > 'wish list' for it: >=20 > More-or-less OT question: Shall we switch ULE as the default scheduler > on -HEAD to encourage more testing against it? No, it's already known to have stability problems (on large SMP machines) and performance problems under load (about 10-20% slower than 4BSD), so until someone fixes those there's no point. Kris --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDox1eWry0BWjoQKURAqCpAJ9pSdDJT/YjzdO/3jYHjiD13fmXGACdEFcM Ry4YKG63qoxpPo9L17eo0mQ= =tXyq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s--