From owner-freebsd-xen@freebsd.org  Wed Sep  9 12:28:12 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-xen@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ED61A00E64
 for <freebsd-xen@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Wed,  9 Sep 2015 12:28:12 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from prvs=687bbb327=roger.pau@citrix.com)
Received: from SMTP02.CITRIX.COM (smtp02.citrix.com [66.165.176.63])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "mail.citrix.com",
 Issuer "Verizon Public SureServer CA G14-SHA2" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 221421952
 for <freebsd-xen@freebsd.org>; Wed,  9 Sep 2015 12:28:11 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from prvs=687bbb327=roger.pau@citrix.com)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,496,1437436800"; d="scan'208";a="302346454"
Subject: Re: XenServer 6.5(SP1) - HVM 're0: watchdog timeout' errors...
To: Karl Pielorz <kpielorz_lst@tdx.co.uk>, Adam McDougall
 <mcdouga9@egr.msu.edu>, <freebsd-xen@freebsd.org>
References: <9CC4073DE17E3C8BD01EF7D3@[10.12.30.106]>
 <55EDA470.1000007@citrix.com> <C1F8BAECAFA8EB8C9A97D5FA@[10.12.30.106]>
 <55EDC55B.8000004@egr.msu.edu> <762F895FF087C3BBB6DB94DA@[10.12.30.106]>
 <BBDE686A05E03437BB32667C@[10.12.30.106]> <55EFF61A.3020409@citrix.com>
 <34C596D4CD79963C95725C41@[10.12.30.106]>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=c3=a9?= <roger.pau@citrix.com>
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110
Message-ID: <55F025BF.6020405@citrix.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 14:27:43 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:38.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <34C596D4CD79963C95725C41@[10.12.30.106]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-DLP: MIA2
X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage
 <freebsd-xen.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-xen>,
 <mailto:freebsd-xen-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-xen/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-xen@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-xen-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen>,
 <mailto:freebsd-xen-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 12:28:12 -0000

Hello,

El 09/09/15 a les 11.33, Karl Pielorz ha escrit:
> 
> 
> --On 09 September 2015 11:04 +0200 Roger Pau Monné
> <roger.pau@citrix.com> wrote:
> 
>> I'm working on importing a new netfront from Linux, which hopefully
>> should solve the problems we are having with the PV nic.
> 
> That'll be great - I did test a CentOS box domU a while ago, and that
> didn't have the problem with routing traffic, I wasn't able to test
> things like OpenVPN/DCHP on it - but the current netfront issues are
> annoying [there's at least 2 FreeBSD PR's I know of this would also
> address].

Do you have an easy way to replicate those issues, right now I'm trying
with the following:

/etc/etc.conf:
pf_enable="YES"

/etc/pf.conf
block in all
pass out all keep state

But I don't seem to be able to reproduce them. Throughput between
DomU<->Dom0 or DomU<->DomU seems to be fine (no degradation when
compared to pf off).

Roger.