From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 16 08:42:36 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17BA037B401 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 08:42:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp012.mail.yahoo.com (smtp012.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.173.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6FC6543F85 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 08:42:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rohitvis@rogers.com) Received: from cpe0002a5b30bb5-cm0000396edc60.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com (HELO raptor) (rohitvis@63.138.113.68 with plain) by smtp.mail.vip.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 16 Jun 2003 15:42:35 -0000 From: Rohit To: Jud , Shantanu Mahajan Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 08:42:31 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 References: <200306131035.51185.rohitvis@rogers.com> <20030614065823.GA217@dhumketu.homeunix.net> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200306160842.31179.rohitvis@rogers.com> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Booting takes too long. Why? (/ was not properly dismounted) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:42:36 -0000 Thanks for your help Jud, you are absolutely right. With issuing the halt command, there are no excessive delays in booting. Inface booting is really fast. Thanks Rohit On Saturday 14 June 2003 20:04, Jud wrote: > On Sat, 14 Jun 2003 12:28:23 +0530, Shantanu Mahajan > > wrote: > > | I shutdown using the shutdown -h now command > > | or reboot using reboot now > > > > did you try 'halt'? > > what msg. do you see after the shutdown is complete? > > From the halt(8) man page: > > "Normally, the shutdown(8) utility is used when the system needs to be > halted or restarted, giving users advance warning of their impending doom > and cleanly terminating specific programs." > > From the shutdown(8) man page: > > "The following options are available: > -h The system is halted at the specified time." > > So Rohit is in fact using 'halt' in the way it is normally invoked, as an > option to 'shutdown.' Is there a reason that 'halt' without 'shutdown' > would be preferable in this case? > > Jud > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"