Date: Tue, 22 Oct 1996 14:52:25 -0700 From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> To: Joerg Wunsch <joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de> Cc: FreeBSD hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: comments on this change please. Message-ID: <326D4219.446B9B3D@whistle.com> References: <199610222030.WAA19354@uriah.heep.sax.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
J Wunsch wrote: > > As Julian Elischer wrote: > > > yeah I guess so, though once syslogd has been run r/w it's there.. :) > > Hmpf. Nope. (I've missed this in your diff.) Don't do _this_! > > You don't expect the termcap library to create the /etc/termcap link. > You shouldn't expect syslogd to create the /dev/log link, either. > That's a matter of the system installation (or upgrade procedure for > those tracking -current). I'd rather have it for the transition period at least.. > If the symlink is there, i wouldn't expect surprises. sure and I'm cutting back on 'maintanance calls' by checking that it's there.. It's transition code and I expect it to go away.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?326D4219.446B9B3D>