Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 11:26:40 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> To: Derek Kulinski <takeda@takeda.tk> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Problem reading vitals from Gigabyte H77-DH3H Message-ID: <50826040.6010106@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <994545137.20121020010809@takeda.tk> References: <1286515493.20121017131543@takeda.tk> <507F1761.1010202@FreeBSD.org> <20121017205147.GB36106@chinatsu.takeda.tk> <5081552F.2050303@FreeBSD.org> <771658188.20121019205010@takeda.tk> <508254AF.7040709@FreeBSD.org> <994545137.20121020010809@takeda.tk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 20/10/2012 11:08 Derek Kulinski said the following: > Hello Andriy, > > Saturday, October 20, 2012, 12:37:19 AM, you wrote: [snip] >> Could you please also fetch sysutils/superiotool port from here >> https://redports.org/browser/avg/sysutils/superiotool, replace what you have >> under /usr/ports, install the port and then run 'superiotool -d' command? > > No luck: > [chinatsu]:/tank/junk/ports/sysutils/superiotool# superiotool -d > superiotool r4.0-2827-g1a00cf0 > No Super I/O found Hmm, it would be a pity if all of this was a waste of time... I based some of my assumptions on googling, in particular this post http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.bios.flashrom/1163 mentioned: Found ITE Super I/O, ID 0x8728 on port 0x2e BTW, I suppose "DH3H" in the subject line is a typo? Or is it a different model? Oh, hmm, looks like even the latest superiotool may not have support for this newer chip. Could you please run superiotool -V | fgrep Failed | fgrep -v ff ? If this command returns id=0x8728, then you could hack superiotool source code between running 'make patch' and 'make'. You could edit ite.c file, search for 0x8726 and either change it to 0x8728 or duplicate the whole section and make the change there. -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50826040.6010106>