From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Sep 19 14:20:40 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from barbera.system.pl (barbera.system.pl [195.205.185.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D093B37B43C for ; Tue, 19 Sep 2000 14:20:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from saper@localhost) by barbera.system.pl (SYSTEM Internet) id e8JLI1689006; Tue, 19 Sep 2000 23:18:01 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 23:18:01 +0200 From: Marcin Cieslak To: Bill Moran Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Solaris desktop and server differences Message-ID: <20000919231801.B75224@barbera.system.pl> Mail-Followup-To: Bill Moran , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <39BFA09B.49564234@columbus.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <39BFA09B.49564234@columbus.rr.com>; from wmoran@columbus.rr.com on Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 11:43:23AM -0400 Organization: SYSTEM Internet Provider - http://www.system.pl/ Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Bill Moran (wmoran@columbus.rr.com) napisał(a): > I wonder how Sun enforces their licensing? They don't. I even managed to run Desktop version on a multiprocessor machine (Server license is required to do that). Another reason why we should not mess with FreeBSD - it's FREE and we don't have to differentiate our market between those who may want to pay more for essentialy the same product. And hands off the installation procedure - I find existing novice/express/custom model nearly ideal. -- << Marcin Cieslak // saper@system.pl >> ----------------------------------------------------------------- SYSTEM Internet Provider http://www.system.pl To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message