From owner-freebsd-emulation Sun Feb 14 09:51:11 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA18523 for freebsd-emulation-outgoing; Sun, 14 Feb 1999 09:51:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from storage.delta.odessa.ua (maxa01.TM.Odessa.UA [195.66.192.61]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA18510 for ; Sun, 14 Feb 1999 09:51:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from vns@delta.odessa.ua) Received: (from vns@localhost) by storage.delta.odessa.ua (8.9.2/8.8.8) id TAA04066; Sun, 14 Feb 1999 19:50:17 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from vns) Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 19:50:17 +0200 (EET) From: "Vladimir N.Silyaev" Message-Id: <199902141750.TAA04066@storage.delta.odessa.ua> To: jfieber@indiana.edu, vns@delta.odessa.ua Subject: Re: Linux async I/O Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > > Anybody can explain status of native Linux async I/O? > > It was broken until I started working on sybase. I fixed it (it > was a problem in the emulator code) but a post-3.0 change to the > native implementation broke it . I haven't had time to > investigate. Have a look at what has changed between 3.0 and now > for the native implementation. The changes may be very simple - the unification handling LINUX_SIOCSPGRP as LINUX_FIOSETOWN, how the Linux does. But it broke the POSIX semantic for the linux app's. And I have initial question, what is a same handling FIOSETOWN and SIOSPGRP in linux kernel, the bug, the feature or some also? With best regards, V.Silyaev. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message