From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Jun 20 17:47:31 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id RAA00309 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 20 Jun 1996 17:47:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from seagull.rtd.com (root@seagull.rtd.com [198.102.68.2]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA00288; Thu, 20 Jun 1996 17:47:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from dgy@localhost) by seagull.rtd.com (8.7.5/1.2) id OAA15651; Thu, 20 Jun 1996 14:47:28 -0700 (MST) From: Don Yuniskis Message-Id: <199606202147.OAA15651@seagull.rtd.com> Subject: dmake documents To: freebsd-hackers@freefall.FreeBSD.org (FreeBSD hackers) Date: Thu, 20 Jun 1996 14:47:28 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-ports@freefall.FreeBSD.org (FreeBSD ports) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I was playing with the port of dmake recently. I tried to install the troff source for the man page -- which is not installed in the normal package -- and seem to have a problem with one of the macros. Specifically, the definition of the ``Ii'' macro seems to invoke the ``}N'' macro in a trap (e.g., ".it 1 }N"). Presumably, this ends the diversion in effect and generates the output. But, I can't find a macro ``}N'' anywhere in the man page. Nor is it part of my tmac.* stuff. Is this an artifact of some *other* set of macros (i.e. from a different vendor)? Does anyone have the text of said macro? Or, should I just roll my own and hope for the best?? Thanks, --don