From owner-freebsd-current  Sat Feb 10 17:38:14 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id RAA27402
          for current-outgoing; Sat, 10 Feb 1996 17:38:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id RAA27394
          for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 10 Feb 1996 17:38:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id RAA29633; Sat, 10 Feb 1996 17:37:16 -0800
To: Julian Elischer <julian@ref.tfs.com>
cc: terry@lambert.org, KentH@HNS.St-Louis.Mo.US, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: FS PATCHES: THE NEXT GENERATION 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 10 Feb 1996 16:52:03 PST."
             <199602110052.QAA05129@ref.tfs.com> 
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 1996 17:37:15 -0800
Message-ID: <29631.824002635@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

> I put it to you that security of devices is such an important thing
> that you don't want persistance of device ownerships

I put it to you that security of devices is such an important thing
that you definitely want persistance of device ownerships.

:-)

					Jordan