From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 25 12:50:03 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ADF7106566C for ; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 12:50:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62B608FC18 for ; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 12:50:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m3PCo3Vu045616 for ; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 12:50:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.1/Submit) id m3PCo3UR045615; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 12:50:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 12:50:03 GMT Message-Id: <200804251250.m3PCo3UR045615@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org From: Eric F Crist Cc: Subject: Re: kern/123053 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eric F Crist List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 12:50:03 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/123053; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Eric F Crist To: pyunyh@gmail.com Cc: linimon@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-drivers@FreeBSD.org, bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/123053 Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 07:29:01 -0500 On Apr 24, 2008, at 7:25 PM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 05:54:13PM -0500, Eric F Crist wrote: >> Andrey, >> >> I've applied the patch to a 7.0-RELEASE-p1 source tree and rebooted >> my >> system. The card comes UP ok, but shows the following when connected >> to a 100BaseT/ Full Duplex switch port: >> > > By chance, are you referring to kern/123053? That's what the subject of the email says... > >> re0: flags=8802 metric 0 mtu 1500 >> options=9b >> ether 00:1f:c6:52:7b:80 >> media: Ethernet autoselect (10baseT/UTP ) >> status: active >> >> Once I've assigned an IP to the interface, however, it comes up >> correctly and seems to function just fine. Is there any load testing > > I think, that's normal. > >> I should perform for you folks? >> > > Try one of network benchmarks in ports/benchmarks if you want. > >> re0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu >> 1500 >> options=9b >> ether 00:1f:c6:52:7b:80 >> inet 10.0.0.38 netmask 0xffff0000 broadcast 10.0.255.255 >> media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) >> status: active I've run some benchmarks, and they seemed to go pretty badly. After running a few, I realized that I still had two network interfaces up, (em0, and the testing re0), I did an ifconfig em0 down, and was unable to connect in or out from the remaining re0. Perhaps this code isn't all the way complete. Eric ----- Eric F Crist Secure Computing Networks