Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:55:44 -0500 From: Patrick Clochesy <pcloches@gmail.com> To: Grant Peel <gpeel@thenetnow.com> Cc: "<freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Server Questions. Message-ID: <210B4733-618B-48BF-A102-127CAB067BAD@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <69A7C016EF6A4083AFEABFD81B11CC93@GRANT> References: <69A7C016EF6A4083AFEABFD81B11CC93@GRANT>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Celerin is probably fine, I assume you don't have a lot of DNS traffic. Usually NS2 is on another network... If its a 64-bit Xeon, AMD would be the right choice. Last gen Xeons and before... I386. 7.0 has a lot of SMP improvements besides all the other fixes, features and improvements... Why are you shy about using it like it costs more than 6? :) -Patrick On Jun 23, 2008, at 4:38 PM, "Grant Peel" <gpeel@thenetnow.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Two questions for the Web hosting types out there: > > 1. Does anyone use Celeron based nameservers? (i.e. I have two brand > new Dell PE R200s and was considering using them as ns1 and ns2. > What version of FBSD would one use (I am thinking 6.3 Rel, but us > there any compelling reason to use 7.0? > > 2. What machine type would you suggest for Intel Xenon Duel Core? > AMD or i386? Again, is there any real benifit to moving to 7.0 from > a processor standpoint? > > -Grant > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org > "
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?210B4733-618B-48BF-A102-127CAB067BAD>