From owner-freebsd-current Fri Jan 10 03:11:00 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id DAA06170 for current-outgoing; Fri, 10 Jan 1997 03:11:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from whale.gu.kiev.ua (whale.gu.net [194.93.190.4]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id DAA06161; Fri, 10 Jan 1997 03:10:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from trifork.gu.net (trifork.gu.net [194.93.190.194]) by whale.gu.kiev.ua (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA39890; Fri, 10 Jan 1997 13:10:36 +0200 Date: Fri, 10 Jan 1997 16:14:33 +0200 (EET) From: Andrew Stesin To: sos@FreeBSD.ORG cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Who Caught My PS/2 mouse?! + unknown PCI bridge + DD mode In-Reply-To: <199701101014.LAA00544@ravenock.cybercity.dk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Fri, 10 Jan 1997 sos@FreeBSD.ORG wrote: > You should use minor 0 instead of minor 1 ... > It works just fine as has been for ages, maybe we should document this > somewhere, FAQ meister ??... Gmm. As now XFree86 uses /dev/sysmouse as a "default and standard" mouse interface on FreeBSD, should the "minor 0" approach for psm0 become the default since 2.2? Plus a single phrase in psm(4) manpage explaining this, and another in a "What's New" section of RELNOTES? Otherwise _many_ people will ask this very same question again and again. Thanks! Best regards, Andrew Stesin nic-hdl: ST73-RIPE