From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed May 21 12:20:33 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA29800
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 21 May 1997 12:20:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from awfulhak.demon.co.uk (awfulhak.demon.co.uk [158.152.17.1])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA29789
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 21 May 1997 12:20:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from awfulhak.demon.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by awfulhak.demon.co.uk (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA17350;
	Wed, 21 May 1997 19:37:02 +0100 (BST)
Message-Id: <199705211837.TAA17350@awfulhak.demon.co.uk>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.9 8/22/96
To: Thomas David Rivers <ponds!rivers@dg-rtp.dg.com>
cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, ari.suutari@ps.carel.fi
Subject: Re: natd & multiple sl0 ifconfigs... 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 19 May 1997 20:56:53 EDT."
             <199705200056.UAA24171@lakes.water.net> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 21 May 1997 19:37:02 +0100
From: Brian Somers <brian@awfulhak.org>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> 
> I've successfully gotten natd to work - it's exactly what
> the doctor ordered.
> 
> However, when I want to get to work; I use SL/IP, and have
> a particular IP address associated with sl0.
> 
> But - when I want to contact my ISP, I also use SL/IP, with
> a different IP address.
> 
> I start natd with (from rc.local):
> 
>    if [ -f /usr/local/bin/natd ]; then
>         echo -n " natd"; /usr/local/bin/natd -port 32000 -interface sl0 -m -u -d
> ynamic
> 
>    fi
> 
> and in /etc/rc.firewall, I have:
> 
>    #
>    # Do 'natd' style diversion..
>    #
>         ipfw -f flush
>         ipfw -f add divert 32000 ip from any to any via sl0
>         ipfw -f add pass ip from any to any
> 
> 
> 
> As I understood the man page for natd - the -dynamic flag will cause
> natd to "watch" the interface, and make appropriate adjustments should
> the IP change, etc...  but - it doesn't seem to be doing so.
> 
> Does anyone have any experience/thoughts on this?

That's certainly the intention of the -dynamic bit.  Your best bet
is probably to ask the author (cc'd).  The -dynamic switch is pretty
new in natd.

> 	- Thanks -
> 	- Dave Rivers -

-- 
Brian <brian@awfulhak.org>, <brian@freebsd.org>
      <http://www.awfulhak.org>
Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour....